**

The Indian government is reportedly considering invoking the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for the closure and restructuring of two prominent state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the State Trading Corporation of India (STC) and the Projects and Equipment Corporation of India Limited (PEC). This move signifies a significant shift in the government's approach towards loss-making public sector undertakings (PSUs) and has sparked intense debate regarding the future of SOEs and the effectiveness of the IBC process for such large-scale entities.

The IBC Route: A Necessary Evil for Loss-Making SOEs?

The government's exploration of the IBC route for STC and PEC is a departure from the traditional methods of dealing with struggling PSUs, which often involved bailouts or prolonged periods of government support. The IBC, introduced in 2016, provides a time-bound and market-oriented framework for resolving insolvency and bankruptcy, aiming to maximize the recovery of assets for creditors. However, its application to large, complex SOEs like STC and PEC presents unique challenges.

Challenges of Applying IBC to State-Owned Enterprises

• Political Sensitivity: The closure or restructuring of SOEs often carries significant political implications, particularly given the potential impact on employment and the broader economy. This sensitivity can complicate the application of a strictly commercial framework like the IBC.
• Complexity of Operations: STC and PEC have vast and complex operations, making the valuation of assets and liabilities a challenging task. The process of resolving inter-creditor disputes and managing diverse stakeholder interests within the IBC framework could be protracted.
• Government's Role as Creditor: The government is often a significant creditor in SOEs. This raises questions about its impartiality in the IBC process, requiring a clear separation of its roles as regulator, creditor, and sovereign guarantor.

State Trading Corporation (STC) and its Financial Distress

STC, a major player in India's import and export trade, has been grappling with mounting losses for several years. Declining profitability, outdated business models, and increasing competition have contributed to its financial woes. The government's decision to explore the IBC route suggests a recognition that continued financial support is unsustainable. This signals a potential paradigm shift away from the traditional approach of propping up loss-making PSUs, even ones of strategic importance to the country.

Key Factors Contributing to STC's Financial Distress:

• Increased Competition: Globalization and the emergence of private players have intensified competition in the import-export sector, squeezing STC's profit margins.
• Inefficient Operations: Obsolete technology and bureaucratic inefficiencies have hampered STC's ability to adapt to the changing market dynamics.
• Changing Trade Policies: Shifting global trade policies and regulations have also impacted STC's operations and profitability.

Projects and Equipment Corporation (PEC) and its Future under IBC

Similarly, PEC, involved in the import and export of capital goods and project management, has also faced financial difficulties. The government's consideration of the IBC route for PEC reflects a broader strategy of streamlining and restructuring SOEs to enhance efficiency and financial health. This approach may potentially lead to the privatization of parts of PEC or its strategic sale, which may be the most profitable option under the IBC framework.

Analyzing PEC's Financial Situation and Restructuring Options:

• Asset Monetization: The IBC process would allow for the efficient monetization of PEC's assets, maximizing returns for creditors.
• Strategic Disinvestment: A strategic buyer could potentially revitalize PEC's operations, introducing fresh capital and expertise.
• Liquidation: In the worst-case scenario, complete liquidation under the IBC might be necessary if no viable buyer or restructuring plan is found.

Implications of IBC for SOE Restructuring in India

The government's consideration of the IBC route for STC and PEC sets a crucial precedent for the restructuring of other loss-making SOEs. This move reflects a growing recognition that the traditional approach of perpetual government support is not financially sustainable in the long run. The successful implementation of IBC in this context could signal a major restructuring of the public sector landscape in India.

Potential Impacts of this Decision:

• Improved Fiscal Discipline: The IBC process could foster greater financial discipline within SOEs, encouraging them to become more competitive and efficient.
• Enhanced Efficiency: The restructuring process under IBC aims to enhance the efficiency of these enterprises, potentially improving their competitiveness.
• Attracting Private Investment: The efficient resolution of cases under IBC could attract further private investment into the Indian economy.

However, the government needs to ensure a transparent and equitable IBC process, addressing potential challenges related to political interference and the government's dual role as both creditor and regulator. The outcome of these cases will significantly influence the future of SOE reform in India and the broader application of the IBC framework. The success or failure of using the IBC for these large PSUs will be a critical case study for future SOE restructuring attempts. Close monitoring of these developments is crucial for understanding the evolving landscape of India's public sector and the effectiveness of its insolvency resolution mechanism.