**

The Housing Forum has issued a scathing critique of the government’s progress on nutrient neutrality, arguing that "little progress" has been made on implementing vital planning reforms and providing sufficient incentives for local councils. This slow pace, they warn, is severely impacting housing delivery across England, exacerbating the existing housing crisis and hindering the country's ambitious environmental goals. The report, released [Date of Report Release], highlights the urgent need for government intervention to unlock stalled housing developments and avoid further environmental damage.

Nutrient Neutrality: A Planning Quagmire

Nutrient neutrality refers to the environmental principle that new developments should not lead to an increase in nutrient pollution in vulnerable ecosystems, such as rivers and waterways. Excessive nutrients, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus, from sewage and agricultural runoff, cause eutrophication, harming aquatic life and water quality. The problem has become particularly acute in areas designated as Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) under the EU Habitats Directive. Many housing developments, especially in environmentally sensitive areas, are effectively being halted due to concerns over breaching nutrient neutrality requirements.

The Impact on Housing Delivery

The Housing Forum’s report emphasizes the significant consequences of the slow implementation of nutrient neutrality policies. Thousands of homes, planned and approved, are currently on hold, directly contributing to the ongoing housing shortage across England. This impacts not only those seeking homes but also the construction industry and wider economy. The report highlights:

• Stalled development projects: Numerous planning applications are stuck in limbo, pending solutions for offsetting nutrient pollution. This creates uncertainty for developers and delays the much-needed supply of new homes.
• Increased development costs: Finding ways to achieve nutrient neutrality often adds significant costs to development projects, potentially making them unviable.
• Reduced housing affordability: Higher development costs ultimately translate to increased housing prices, exacerbating the already pressing affordability crisis.
• Regional disparities: The impact is not uniform, with certain areas facing significantly greater challenges due to higher concentrations of SPAs and SACs and limited mitigation options.

Lack of Incentives for Local Councils: A Critical Flaw

The Housing Forum’s criticism extends beyond the slow implementation of nutrient mitigation measures. The report strongly criticizes the lack of adequate incentives and support for local councils struggling to navigate the complex regulatory framework. Councils are tasked with managing the process, yet they lack the resources and expertise to effectively implement nutrient neutrality regulations. The Forum argues that this imbalance leaves councils struggling to balance environmental protection with the vital need for housing.

The Need for Government Intervention: Key Recommendations

The report outlines several key recommendations to address the current stalemate:

• Increased funding: Significantly increased funding is required for local councils to develop and implement effective nutrient management plans. This includes funding for environmental monitoring, mitigation strategies, and expert advice.
• Simplified planning process: The current planning process needs streamlining to reduce bureaucratic delays and uncertainties. Clearer guidance and faster decision-making are crucial.
• Development of innovative mitigation strategies: Investment in research and development of innovative and cost-effective nutrient mitigation solutions is essential to unlock stalled housing projects. This could involve exploring nature-based solutions, such as wetland creation or enhanced wastewater treatment.
• Targeted incentives: The government needs to implement targeted incentives to encourage councils and developers to adopt sustainable and efficient nutrient mitigation strategies. This could include financial incentives, tax breaks, or streamlined planning permissions.
• National Nutrient Management Strategy: A comprehensive national strategy for nutrient management is needed to provide a clear framework for all stakeholders and ensure consistent application of regulations across England.

Environmental Impact Assessments and the Future of Planning

The nutrient neutrality challenge underscores the increasing complexity of balancing environmental protection with the pressing need for new housing. Effective environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are essential to ensure developments minimize their ecological footprint. The government needs to ensure EIAs are robust, efficient, and integrated into the planning process to facilitate timely decision-making without compromising environmental standards. This also includes ensuring sufficient resources are allocated to ensure high quality EIAs are conducted.

Conclusion: Urgent Action Required

The Housing Forum's report serves as a stark warning of the far-reaching consequences of inaction on nutrient neutrality. The current situation is causing significant delays in housing delivery, hindering economic growth, and potentially damaging the environment. The government must act swiftly and decisively to implement the recommendations outlined in the report. Failure to do so will only exacerbate the housing crisis and undermine efforts to protect England's valuable natural habitats. The future of housing development in England, and the country’s ability to meet its environmental commitments, depends on immediate and decisive action on this critical issue. The debate around nutrient neutrality and the impact on planning permissions will likely continue, with stakeholders urging a balanced approach that safeguards both environmental interests and the need for new housing.