**

Bofors Scandal Revisited: Baba Kalyani's Bombshell Revelation on Tech Transfer and Indigenous Artillery Development

The Bofors scandal, a decades-old controversy that continues to haunt Indian politics, has taken a dramatic new turn. Baba Kalyani, chairman of Bharat Forge, a leading Indian defense manufacturer, has made explosive claims, asserting that not only was the technology for the controversial Bofors howitzer fully transferred to India in the 1980s, but he even proposed the development of entirely made-in-India artillery guns to the then-Congress government. His revelations, however, are tinged with frustration over the lack of subsequent support for indigenous defense production. This throws a fresh spotlight on the long-standing debate about self-reliance in defense manufacturing and the complexities of India's defense procurement process.

The Bofors Legacy: A Brief Recap

The Bofors scandal, centered around the procurement of 410 FH-77B howitzers from the Swedish arms manufacturer Bofors in 1986, involved allegations of bribery and corruption. The deal, worth approximately ₹1,437 crore (approximately $1.4 billion at the time), triggered a major political crisis in India, leading to extensive investigations and tarnishing the reputation of several prominent figures. Despite the extensive investigations and numerous allegations, the central question of technology transfer and its extent remained largely unresolved. The lack of transparency and the enduring controversy have fueled speculation and mistrust for decades. Keywords: Bofors scandal, Bofors howitzer, FH-77B, Indian defense procurement, corruption in India, 1986 Bofors deal, Rajiv Gandhi, Swedish arms deal

Kalyani's Explosive Claims: Full Tech Transfer and Indigenous Proposals

Kalyani’s recent statements dramatically reshape the narrative surrounding the Bofors deal. He claims that the technology transfer was complete, contradicting the long-held perception that crucial aspects of the howitzer's technology were withheld. He further contends that he, representing Bharat Forge, had proposed to the Congress government, during Rajiv Gandhi's tenure, a plan for developing completely indigenous artillery systems, eliminating the reliance on foreign manufacturers altogether.

“The Bofors technology was fully transferred to India,” Kalyani stated, adding, “We had even proposed developing indigenous guns. We had the capability, but it wasn't taken up.” This assertion raises critical questions about the government's priorities in defense technology and its commitment to nurturing indigenous capabilities. The lack of government response to his proposals, he suggests, demonstrates a missed opportunity to foster self-reliance in a crucial sector. Keywords: Baba Kalyani, Bharat Forge, Made in India, indigenous defense, self-reliance in defense, technology transfer, artillery guns, defense manufacturing in India

The Missed Opportunity for Indigenous Artillery Development

Kalyani's statement highlights a recurring theme in India's defense sector: the persistent struggle to balance the need for rapid modernization with the long-term goal of achieving self-reliance. His claim underscores the potential cost of prioritizing short-term solutions over strategic investments in domestic capabilities.

• Lack of long-term vision: Kalyani's assertion suggests a lack of a cohesive long-term vision in defense planning, prioritizing immediate needs over sustained indigenous development.
• Bureaucratic hurdles: The defense procurement process in India is often criticized for its bureaucratic complexities and delays, which may have hindered the adoption of Kalyani's proposals.
• Skepticism towards domestic capabilities: There might have been an inherent skepticism within government circles regarding the capabilities of Indian companies to develop cutting-edge defense technology, leading to reliance on foreign vendors.

These factors, Kalyani implies, created an environment where his proposals, potentially offering a path towards indigenous artillery supremacy, were overlooked. The opportunity to establish a robust domestic artillery industry, potentially reducing future dependence on foreign suppliers, appears to have been missed. Keywords: Defense procurement process, bureaucracy in India, Indian defense industry, indigenization of defense, technology dependence

Implications and Future Outlook

Kalyani's revelations have reopened a crucial conversation about India's defense preparedness and its commitment to self-reliance. His claims, if substantiated, raise serious questions about past policy decisions and their long-term consequences.

The statement adds a new layer of complexity to the Bofors scandal, shifting the focus from mere allegations of corruption to broader issues of technological self-sufficiency and effective policymaking. It necessitates a fresh examination of the government's approach to defense procurement and its support for indigenous industries. The current government’s emphasis on "Make in India" initiatives for defense resonates strongly with Kalyani's claims, highlighting the ongoing importance of fostering domestic manufacturing capabilities. Keywords: Make in India, defense reforms, national security, Indian military modernization

The Need for Transparency and Accountability

The controversy underscores the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in defense procurement. Independent investigations and the release of relevant documents could shed light on the events surrounding Kalyani's proposals and the decision-making process of the government at the time. This enhanced transparency would be crucial in building public trust and ensuring future decisions are guided by national interests.

The implications of Kalyani's revelations extend far beyond the Bofors scandal itself. They serve as a cautionary tale about the potential costs of neglecting indigenous capabilities and the critical need for a more strategic and transparent approach to defense planning and procurement in India. Further investigation and open dialogue are required to fully understand the implications of this recent revelation and to prevent similar setbacks in the future. Keywords: Transparency in government, accountability in government, defense policy, national defense strategy

In conclusion, Baba Kalyani's statement is not merely a historical recollection; it's a powerful indictment of past decisions and a call for a fundamental reassessment of India's defense strategy. The controversy surrounding the Bofors deal continues to evolve, underscoring the need for a renewed commitment to self-reliance and transparent governance in India’s crucial defense sector.