**

Aadhaar Deactivation Rate Low Despite Millions of Annual Deaths: RTI Exposes Discrepancy

A recent Right to Information (RTI) response has revealed a significant discrepancy between the number of Aadhaar cards deactivated and the annual death rate in India. The data, obtained from the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), paints a surprising picture: only 1.15 crore (11.5 million) Aadhaar numbers have been deactivated in the 14 years since the program's inception, while an estimated 83.5 lakh (8.35 million) people die annually in India, according to official statistics. This startling contrast raises important questions about the effectiveness of the Aadhaar deactivation process and the potential for misuse of dormant accounts.

The Aadhaar Deactivation Process: A Closer Look

The UIDAI, responsible for issuing and managing Aadhaar numbers, has a process in place for deactivating Aadhaar cards. This typically happens when the individual dies, or requests the deactivation themselves. However, the RTI response highlights a potential bottleneck in this process. The low number of deactivated Aadhaar cards suggests significant challenges in identifying and removing deceased individuals' records from the database, which could have significant implications for data security and government services.

Challenges in Aadhaar Deactivation

Several factors could contribute to the low deactivation rate:

• Lack of Awareness: Many people might be unaware of the procedure to deactivate an Aadhaar card after the death of a family member. The process itself might be complex or require documentation that isn't readily available.
• Administrative Delays: The bureaucratic process of deactivating an Aadhaar card could be slow and inefficient, leading to significant delays. This is exacerbated by potential inconsistencies in reporting deaths across different states.
• Data Synchronization Issues: There might be a lack of effective data synchronization between the UIDAI database and other government databases, such as those maintaining death records. This could prevent timely deactivation of Aadhaar cards after a person's death.
• Lack of Proactive Measures: The UIDAI might not have robust systems in place to proactively identify and deactivate Aadhaar numbers associated with deceased individuals. A more proactive approach, potentially using data from other government databases, could significantly improve efficiency.
• Potential for Misuse: The existence of a large number of dormant Aadhaar accounts presents a potential security risk, raising concerns about identity theft and fraudulent activities.

The Significance of Accurate Data Management

Accurate data management is crucial for the success of any government program, especially one as significant as Aadhaar. The Aadhaar database is linked to various government services, including financial transactions, healthcare benefits, and welfare schemes. The presence of dormant or inactive accounts could lead to inefficiencies, potential fraud, and misallocation of resources.

The Need for Improvements

The RTI data underscores the need for immediate improvements to the Aadhaar deactivation process. The UIDAI needs to address the challenges mentioned above to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the database. Potential solutions include:

• Streamlining the Deactivation Process: Simplification of the deactivation process and clear guidelines for family members can improve efficiency.
• Enhanced Data Synchronization: Improved data sharing and synchronization between the UIDAI and other government agencies responsible for maintaining death records are essential.
• Proactive Deactivation Initiatives: Implementing proactive measures to identify and deactivate Aadhaar accounts of deceased individuals through data matching and cross-referencing.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating the public about the importance of Aadhaar deactivation and providing clear instructions on how to perform the process.

Implications and Future Outlook

The discrepancy between the number of deactivated Aadhaar cards and the annual death rate raises serious concerns about data security and governance. The low deactivation rate could also potentially impact the accuracy of government statistics and hinder the effectiveness of various social welfare programs. The UIDAI needs to take proactive steps to address these issues to maintain the integrity of the Aadhaar system and ensure its continued usefulness as a crucial element of India's digital infrastructure. Furthermore, regular audits and transparent reporting on Aadhaar deactivation rates are crucial to ensure accountability and build public trust.

The information revealed by the RTI highlights the need for a more comprehensive and efficient approach to managing the Aadhaar database, improving data accuracy, and enhancing security measures. This will require a collaborative effort between the UIDAI and other government agencies to ensure the system remains effective and secure for years to come. Moving forward, focusing on preventative measures, improved communication, and technological advancements will be key in bridging the gap between official death records and the deactivation of Aadhaar numbers. Failure to do so could lead to substantial issues with national identity management and the effectiveness of various government services. The focus should shift from simply reacting to reported deaths to proactively identifying and managing dormant accounts, enhancing the overall integrity and utility of the Aadhaar system.